[Long-term efficacy and safety of divozilimab during 2-year treatment of multiple sclerosis patients in randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS]. / Effektivnost' i bezopasnost' dvukhletnei terapii divozilimabom u patsientov s rasseyannym sklerozom v ramkakh randomizirovannogo dvoinogo slepogo platsebo-kontroliruemogo klinicheskogo issledovaniya BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody divozilimab (DIV) used as an intravenous infusion at a dose of 500 mg every 24 weeks during 100 weeks for the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), including relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS) with relapses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The multicenter, randomized, double-blind and double-masked phase III clinical trial (CT) BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS (NCT05385744) included 338 adult patients with MS distributed in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: DIV 500 mg and teriflunomide (TRF) 14 mg. After screening, subjects were included in the main CT period, which consisted of two cycles of therapy over 48 weeks, then entered an additional period from weeks 49 to 100, which included three cycles of therapy. The efficacy was assessed based on the results of brain MRI and registration of data on relapses. RESULTS: 308 subjects completed 5 therapy cycles according to the study protocol. An analysis of the effectiveness of DIV therapy over 2 years showed a persistent suppression of MRI and clinical activity of the disease in comparison with TRF, which was confirmed by all the studied MRI indicators (including CUA; total number of gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) lesions on T1-weighted scans ; number of new or enlarged lesions on T2-weighted scans; lesions volume change on T2-weighted scans; change in the volume of hypointense lesions on T1-weighted scans). The use of DIV was associated with a statistically significant decrease in ARR compared to TRF (p=0.0001). The ARR in the DIV group was 0.057, in the TRF group - 0.164 with 95% confidential interval for the frequency ratio [0.202; 0.593]. The incidence of GdE lesions on T1-weighted scans in the DIV group was significantly lower than in the TRF group. The average number of such lesions was 0.0±0.08 and 1.0±4.46 in the DIV and TRF groups, respectively (p<0.0001). Progression of EDSS was detected in 18 (10.7%) and 36 (21.3%) patients in the DIV and TRF groups, respectively (p=0.0075). The proportion of patients with relapses was 11.2% (n=19) in the DIV group and 23.1% (n=39) in the TRF group (p=0.0039). In the subpopulation of patients with SPMS, no cases of increase in EDSS were detected, and not a single case of exacerbation was recorded over 2 years of using DIV. Also, DIV has shown a favorable safety profile. Among the adverse reactions (AR), infusion reactions and laboratory abnormalities, such as a decrease in the number of leukocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, were most often recorded. Identified AR were expected, had mild to moderate severity, and resolved without any negative consequences. CONCLUSION: The results of the BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS CT indicate a high sustained efficacy and safety of long-term use of DIV in comparison with TRF during 2 years of therapy.

[Efficacy and safety of antiCD20 monoclonal antibody divozilimab during 48-week treatment of multiple sclerosis patients in randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS]. / Effektivnost' i bezopasnost' 48 nedel'nogo primeneniya monoklonal'nogo antitela protiv CD20 divozilimaba u patsientov s rasseyannym sklerozom: rezul'taty randomizirovannogo dvoinogo slepogo platsebo-kontroliruemogo klinicheskogo issledovaniya BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody divozilimab (DIV) used as an intravenous infusion at a dose of 500 mg for the treatment of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in comparison with the teriflunomide (TRF). The study of the efficacy and safety of the use of the drug DIV was carried out for 48 weeks of therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The multicenter, randomized, double-blind and double-masked phase III clinical trial (CT) BCD-132-4/MIRANTIBUS included 338 adult patients with RRMS distributed in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: DIV 500 mg and TRF 14 mg. After screening, subjects were included in the main CT period, which consisted of two cycles of therapy over 48 weeks. The primary end point was «Mean annualized relapse rate 48 weeks after the last patient is randomized in the study¼. RESULTS: 321 subjects completed 48 weeks of therapy according to the study protocol. The analysis of the of efficacy data for the primary endpoint successively proved the hypothesis of superiority of the test drug DIV at a dose of 500 mg over the reference drug TRF. A rapid suppression of acute disease activity according to the brain MRI and clinical manifestations of the disease was shown after the first infusion of DIV in patients with RRMS. Thus, after 48 weeks of therapy in patients treated with DIV, there were no T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions, while in the TRF group such lesions were observed in 20.7% (35/169) of subjects. Evaluation of the CUA per scan showed that the mean values for the estimated period were statistically significantly lower in the DIV drug group compared to the TRF group: the ratio of the adjusted per scan rates (DIV/TRF) was 0.125 [95% CI: 0.089; 0.177]. Over the 48 weeks of therapy, the proportion of subjects with relapses was 9.5% (n=16/169) in the DIV group and 19.5% (33/169) in the TRF group (p=0.0086). DIV has shown a favorable safety profile. Among the adverse reactions (AR), infusion reactions and deviations of laboratory data, such as a decrease in the number of leukocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, were most often recorded. Identified AR were expected, had mild to moderate severity, and resolved without any negative consequences. CONCLUSION: The results of the clinical study indicate the high efficacy and safety of DIV in comparison with TRF.

[Efficacy and safety of divozilimab during 24-week treatment of multiple sclerosis patients in randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial BCD-132-2]. / Effektivnost' i bezopasnost' 24 nedel' primeneniya divozilimaba sredi patsientov s rasseyannym sklerozom v ramkakh randomizirovannogo dvoinogo slepogo platsebo-kontroliruemogo klinicheskogo issledovaniya BCD-132-2.

OBJECTIVE: To find the optimal therapeutic dose of the anti-B cell mAb divozilimab (DIV) based on the efficacy and safety data of intravenous administration at a dose of 125 mg or 500 mg in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) compared to placebo (PBO) and teriflunomide (TRF). To study the efficacy and safety of DIV within 24 weeks of treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind and double-masked, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial (CT) BCD-132-2 involved 271 adult patients with RRMS from 25 centres In Russia. Patients were randomly assigned (2:2:2:1) into 4 groups: TRF, DIV 125 mg, DIV 500 mg and PBO. After screening patients entered to the main period, which consisted of one cycle of therapy for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the total number of gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions (Gd+) observed on brain MRI scans after 24 weeks (per scan - involves estimating the mean value of the score from all the MRI assessments performed for each participant in the study). RESULTS: 263 patients completed 24 weeks of treatment. Most of the patients in the DIV groups had no lesions on T1-weighted MRI after 24 weeks of treatment (94.44% on 125 mg and 93.06% on 500 mg). In the TRF and PBO groups the values were significantly lower: 68.06% and 56.36% respectively (both p<0.05). The proportions of relapse-free patients in the DIV groups were 93.06% and 97.22% (125 mg and 500 mg, respectively). As expected, DIV reduced the CD19+ B-cells. However, the repopulation rate of CD19+ B-cells in the 125 mg group was more pronounced (mainly due to the recovering pool of CD27-naive B-cells) compared to the 500 mg group. DIV showed a favorable safety profile at both doses. CONCLUSION: Thus, the assessment of 24 weeks treatment demonstrated that DIV is a highly effective, safe and convenient option for the treatment of RRMS patients, both naive and previously treated with disease modifying therapy. A dose of 500 mg is recommended for further efficacy and safety evaluation during phase 3 CT.

[Efficacy and safety of sampeginterferon ß-1a in the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: results of 52 weeks of therapy in a randomized, double-blind clinical trial]. / Effektivnost' i bezopasnost' sampeginterferona ß-1a dlya lecheniya remittiruyushchego rasseyannogo skleroza: rezul'taty 52-nedel'nogo randomizirovannogo dvoinogo slepogo klinicheskogo issledovaniya.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of samPEG-IFN-ß1a 180 µg and 240 µg administered once every 2 weeks for the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) compared to placebo and low dose interferon beta-1a (LIB) 30 µg administered once weekly. The primary endpoint after 52 weeks of therapy was the time to first relapse, the hypotheses of non-inferiority and superiority to LIB were tested. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This international, multicenter, double blind, comparative, placebo-controlled clinical study enrolled 399 patients with the diagnosis of RRMS, randomized in 4 groups: samPEG-IFN-ß1a180 µg (n=114), samPEG-IFN-ß1a 240 µg (n=114), LIB (n=114) and placebo (n=57). Placebo group patients participated in the study for 20 weeks. After 52 weeks of therapy and 4 weeks of follow-up, LIB group patients completed their participation in the study, patients from PEG-IFN-ß1a groups continued to receive therapy until week 100 inclusive. The article presents the results of an analysis conducted after the end of 52 weeks of a double-blind, comparative, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. RESULTS: Final analysis of the efficacy and safety was performed after 52 weeks of study. Main statistical hypothesis testing proved that both doses of samPEG-IFN-ß1a were equally effective when compared to LIB by the primary endpoint - «Time to first relapse¼. Due to detection of statistically significant differences in the primary endpoint between the study drug and the reference drug, indicating a greater efficacy of the study drug, an additional testing was carried out and the hypothesis of superiority of samPEG-IFN-ß1a at a dose of 240 µg over the reference LIB was proved. Evaluation of the dynamics of certain key parameters of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and clinical outcomes demonstrated a positive effect of samPEG-IFN-ß1a therapy in the form of decreased activity of the demyelinating process in the brain and reduce the number of relapses. The proportion of patients without new T2 lesions after 52 weeks was 87.6% and 90.4% in 180 µg and 240 µg samPEG-IFN-ß1a groups, versus 72.6% in the LIB group (p=0.0199 and p=0.0033). No progression of multiple sclerosis was shown based on EDSS scale evaluation. During the study, the most common adverse reactions were flu-like symptoms and injection site reactions. CONCLUSION: The new drug samPEG-IFN-ß1a is an effective and safe agent for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis treatment, while having an advantage over other low-dose interferons in the form of reduced frequency of intramuscular injections.

[Results of a phase 1 clinical study of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (BCD-132): pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety]. / Rezul'taty I fazy klinicheskogo issledovaniia monoklonal'nogo antitela protiv CD20 (BCD-132): farmakokinetika, farmakodinamika i bezopasnost'.

AIM: To study the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of two intravenous dosing regimens of the new anti-B-cells drug BCD-132 (JSC BIOCAD, Russia) at ascending doses in patients with remitting multiple sclerosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with multiple sclerosis were sequentially randomized in the multicenter open-label uncontrolled multicohort phase I study (3+3 design) and assigned to 4 cohorts (8 groups). Patients in each cohort received an intravenous infusion of BCD-132 at a predefined dose ranging from 100 to 1000 mg based on the planned algorithm of dose escalation if no dose-limiting toxicities occurred. RESULTS: The assessment of the number of cells positive for the main B-cell antigens over time demonstrated a direct effect of BCD-132 on B lymphocytes when used at a wide range of doses (100 to 1000 mg) in patients with remitting multiple sclerosis. No significant variation of the number of T-cells was observed, which clearly proves strict specificity of BCD-132 exclusively to B lymphocytes. CONCLUSION: BCD-132 has an expected pharmacodynamic effect of long-term depletion of CD19+ and CD20+ B lymphocytes and an acceptable safety profile when used to treat patients with remitting multiple sclerosis at all tested doses.

[The new pegylated interferon beta-1a (sampeginterferon beta-1a, BCD-054) in the treatment of remitting multiple sclerosis]. / Novyi pegilirovannyi interferon beta-1a (sampéginterferon beta-1a, BCD-054) v terapii remittiruiushchego rasseiannogo skleroza.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of BCD 054 180 µg and 240 µg administered once every 2 weeks for the treatment of remitting multiple sclerosis compared to placebo and low dose interferon beta-1a (LIB) 30 µg administered once weekly. Results of a 20 week blinded interim analysis from a double blind, comparative, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical study are included. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This multinational, multicentre, double blind, comparative, placebo-controlled study enrolled 399 patients with the diagnosis of remitting multiple sclerosis: 114 patients in the sampeginterferon beta 1a and LIB groups each and 57 patients in the placebo group. To ensure the objectivity of data, the study protocol includes a blinded interim analysis to demonstrate the superiority of BCD 054 over placebo based on the number of combined unique active lesions (CUA) on MRI scans after 20 weeks of treatment. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: An integrated analysis of the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics was performed after 20 weeks of study. Mean CUA per scan was lower in the active treatment groups compared to placebo: 0,986±2,046, 0,619±1,055, 0,665±1,165, 1,673±2,376 (groups 1, 2, 3 and placebo group, respectively). The data for CUA per scan demonstrated the superiority of both BCD 054 180 µg and 240 µg over placebo. Patients receiving active treatment had fewer new and/or enlarging lesions after 20 weeks of treatment. The proportion of patients without new T2-weighted lesions was 74,3%, 86,7%, and 78,1% in groups 1, 2, and 3 compared to 64,9% in the placebo group. Manifestations of flu-like syndrome that is expected for interferon treatment were observed with the same incidence in all the active treatment groups. Its severity, duration or the need for symptomatic treatment did not appear to depend on the type of interferon used.

[Possibilities of using cepeginterferon alpha-2b in double (cepeginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin) and triple (simeprevir, cepeginterferon alpha-2b, and ribavirin) antiviral therapy regimens for chronic hepatitis C. A review of clinical trials and experience of everyday clinical practice]. / Vozmozhnosti primeneniia tsepeginterferona al'fa-2b v sostave dvukh- (tsepeginterferon al'fa-2b i ribavirin) i trekhkomponentnoi (simeprevir, tsepeginterferon al'fa-2b i ribavirin) skhem protivovirusnoi terapii khronicheskogo gepatita S. Obzor klinicheskikh issledovanii i opyta povsednevnoi klinicheskoi praktiki.

Since the incidence of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) increases steadily, the priority of national health care is to provide antiviral therapy (AVT) for the maximum number of patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). The regimens including pegylated interferons (PEG-IFN) are still in demand in the Russian Federation. A number of clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cepeginterferon alpha-2b (cePEG-IFN alpha-2b), an original PEG-IFN-α developed in the Russian Federation. Their results have shown that cePEG-IFN alpha-2b in the two-component AVT regimen has at least no less clinical efficacy than PEG-IFN alpha-2b and PEG-INF alpha-2a in HCV monoinfected and HCV/HIV co-infected patients. The pooled analysis of data has indicated that the use of cePEG-IFN alpha-b in combination with ribavirin allows an average of 80% of the patients with HCV genotypes 2 and 3 and 62% of those with HCV genotype 1 to achieve a sustained virological response (SVR). In clinical practice when the two-component AVT regimen (cePEG-IFN alpha-b and ribavirin) was used in patients with early-stage CHC and mild fibrosis, SVR was recorded in 90.7% of the patients with HCV genotype 2/3 and in 75% of those with HCV genotype 1. The experience in using cePEG-IFN alpha-2b as a component of the three-component AVT regimen (simeprevir, cePEG IFN alfa-2b, and ribavirin) has been published. The observational program manly covered young patients with mild or moderate fibrosis. SVR was observed in 94% of the patients. Another paper describes the experience with the triple AVT therapy (simeprevir, cePEG-IFN alfa-2b, and ribavirin) in 22 patients, the majority of whom had advanced fibrosis. SVR was recorded in 71.4% of those who had completed treatment. Thus, an individual approach and assessment of predictive response factors to two- or three-component AVT regimens including cePEG-IFN alpha 2b can achieve successful treatment outcomes in most patients with CHC, which is, in some cases, more economically sound than interferon-free regimens used as first-line therapy.